Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to page footer

Working Paper

Economic Insecurity: Trade Dependencies and Their Weaponization in History

Kiel Working Papers, 2295

Authors

  • Bernstein
  • M.
  • Meyer
  • J.
  • O’Rourke
  • K.
  • Schularick
  • M.

Publication Date

JEL Classification

F13 F14 F41 F51

Key Words

Trade sanctions

Trade dependencies

Vulnerability to sanctions

Financial sanctions

Economic coercion

Effects of sanctions

Related Topics

Geoeconomics

Political Economy

International Trade

Do trade dependencies leave countries vulnerable to geopolitical coercion? We study the economic costs of trade and financial sanctions, from 1920 to the present. We first develop a continuous measure of sanction intensity, using bilateral commodity-level data to calculate the importance of specific flows that fall under sanctions. We find that sanctions inflict relatively small costs on average: sanctioning 1% of GDP worth of imports or exports leads to approximately 0.3 percentage points of lost GDP over a 5-year period and a 0.1 percentage point increase in unemployment. However, we show that sanctions are far more costly for countries whose trade is highly concentrated, and for countries that rely heavily on exporting primary commodities. Low income and developing countries appear most vulnerable to trade sanctions, while high income financial centers and some EU countries are among the most exposed to financial sanctions.

Kiel Institute Experts

  • Dr. Josefin Meyer
    Kiel Institute Fellow
  • Prof. Dr. Moritz Schularick
    President

More Publications

Subject Dossiers

  • Production site fully automatic with robot arms

    Economic Outlook

  • Inside shoot of the cupola of the Reichstag, the building of the German Bundestag.

    Economic Policy in Germany

  • View over cargo ship deck with containers

    International Trade

Research Center

  • International Finance

  • Macroeconomics

  • Trade