Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to page footer

Journal Article

The Politicized Pandemic: Ideological Polarization and the Behavioral Response to COVID-19

Authors

  • Grimalda
  • G.
  • Murtin
  • F.
  • Pipke
  • D.
  • Putterman
  • L.
  • Sutter
  • M.

Publication Date

JEL Classification

D01 D72 D91 I12 I18 H11 H12

Key Words

Covid-19

Health Behavior

Ideology

Polarization

Prosociality

Trust in Politicians

Worries

In a representative sample of the U.S. population during the first summer of the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigate how prosociality and ideology interact in their relationship with health-protecting behavior and trust in the government to handle the crisis. We find that an experimental measure of prosociality based on standard economic games positively relates to protective behavior. Conservatives are less compliant with COVID-19-related behavioral restrictions than liberals and evaluate the government's handling of the crisis significantly more positively. We show that prosociality does not mediate the impact of political ideology. This finding means that conservatives are less compliant with protective health guidelines - independent of differences in prosociality between both ideological camps. Behavioral differences between liberals and conservatives are roughly only one-fourth of the size of their differences in judging the government's crisis management. This result suggests that Americans were more polarized in their political views than in their acceptance of public health advice.

Kiel Institute Expert

  • Dr. David Pipke
    Kiel Institute Researcher

More Publications

Subject Dossiers

  • Two women inspect a solar panel

    Climate and Energy

Research Center

  • Global Transformation