Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to page footer

Journal Article

Overconfidence and gender gaps in redistributive preferences: Cross-Country experimental evidence

Authors

  • Grimalda
  • G.
  • Buser
  • T.
  • Putterman
  • L.
  • van der Weele
  • J.

Publication Date

DOI

10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.005

JEL Classification

C91 J16 H24 D31

Key Words

Gender

overconfidence

Redistribution

risk attitude

Taxation

Voting

Related Topics

Behavioral Economics

Gender differences in voting patterns and political attitudes towards redistribution are well-documented. The experimental gender literature suggests several plausible behavioral explanations behind these differences, relating to gender differences in confidence concerning future relative income position, risk aversion, and social preferences. We use data from lab experiments on preferences for redistribution conducted in the U.S. and several European countries to investigate gender differences and their causes. On aggregate, women’ s demand for redistribution is higher than men’ s, but the differences vary considerably across locations and countries. Moreover, the gender difference appears only when the source of inequality is based on relative abilities, but not when it is based on luck. Our most robust finding is that across all sampled locations, men’ s relatively higher (over)confidence in their abilities, in comparison to women, leads them to specify lower redistribution levels. We discuss the role of confidence in accounting for gender differences in political and redistributive choices outside the lab.

More Publications

Subject Dossiers

  • Two women inspect a solar panel

    Climate and Energy

Research Center

  • Global Transformation