Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to page footer

Working Paper

Guns and Butter: The Fiscal Consequences of Rearmament and War

Kiel Working Papers, 2310

Authors

  • Marzian
  • J.
  • Trebesch
  • C.

Publication Date

JEL Classification

E62 H20 H61 H87 N10 N40

Key Words

Military finance

rearmament

war

fiscal policy

taxes

government debt

Related Topics

War

Geoeconomics

Fiscal Policy & National Budgets

Tax Policy

Welfare State

What are the fiscal consequences of large military buildups? To address this question, we assemble the Global Budget Database, a comprehensive dataset of disaggregated government finances for 20 countries from 1870 to 2022. We identify 114 episodes of military spending booms, in peace and war, and analyze their financing and long-term fiscal legacy. Consistent with theory, wartime booms are financed primarily through debt, while smaller peacetime booms rely on a more balanced mix of debt and taxes. In contrast to the classic notion of “guns versus butter,” we find little evidence that social spending is cut during military expansions. Instead, when societies rearm, they tend to choose guns and butter, resulting in substantially higher debt and taxes long after the military boom ends. Tax rates and tax revenues remain elevated for 15 years or more, as tax increases during the buildup are not rolled back. Large geopolitical shocks expand the fiscal state and result in a persistently higher tax burden.

Kiel Institute Experts

  • Johannes Marzian
    Kiel Institute Researcher
  • Prof. Dr. Christoph Trebesch
    Research Director

More Publications

Topics

  • People demonstrating against war in the Ukraine

    War against Ukraine

Research Center

  • Research Center

    International Finance