Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to page footer

Journal Article

The Politicized Pandemic: Ideological Polarization and the Behavioral Response to COVID-19

Autoren

  • Grimalda
  • G.
  • Murtin
  • F.
  • Pipke
  • D.
  • Putterman
  • L.
  • Sutter
  • M.

Erscheinungsdatum

JEL Classification

D01 D72 D91 I12 I18 H11 H12

Schlagworte

Covid-19

Gesundheitsverhalten

Prosozialität

Sorgen

Vertrauen in Politiker

In a representative sample of the U.S. population during the first summer of the COVID-19 pandemic, we investigate how prosociality and ideology interact in their relationship with health-protecting behavior and trust in the government to handle the crisis. We find that an experimental measure of prosociality based on standard economic games positively relates to protective behavior. Conservatives are less compliant with COVID-19-related behavioral restrictions than liberals and evaluate the government's handling of the crisis significantly more positively. We show that prosociality does not mediate the impact of political ideology. This finding means that conservatives are less compliant with protective health guidelines - independent of differences in prosociality between both ideological camps. Behavioral differences between liberals and conservatives are roughly only one-fourth of the size of their differences in judging the government's crisis management. This result suggests that Americans were more polarized in their political views than in their acceptance of public health advice.

Kiel Institut Expertinnen und Experten

  • Dr. David Pipke
    Kiel Institute Researcher

Mehr Publikationen

Themendossiers

  • Zwei Frauen inspizieren ein Solar Paneel

    Klima und Energie

Forschungszentren

  • Globale Transformation